<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Series of Tubes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://peteashdown.org/journal/2006/07/02/a-series-of-tubes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://peteashdown.org/journal/2006/07/02/a-series-of-tubes/</link>
	<description>Fast Forward the Future</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 20:39:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Pete Ashdown&#8217;s Campaign Journal &#187; Another Option for Net Neutrality</title>
		<link>http://peteashdown.org/journal/2006/07/02/a-series-of-tubes/comment-page-1/#comment-697</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete Ashdown&#8217;s Campaign Journal &#187; Another Option for Net Neutrality</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Jul 2006 18:39:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peteashdown.org/journal/?p=77#comment-697</guid>
		<description>[...] Current efforts to enforce net neutrality give me a healthy amount of skepticism and concern, which I have written about previously. The road to Hell is paved with good intentions, and I must come down on the side of less regulation of the Internet rather than more. Not only are there unintended side-effects from government regulation, but I believe efforts to control the Internet, no matter how well intentioned will only drive individuals, organizations, and companies to countries whose governments do not take a heavy hand. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Current efforts to enforce net neutrality give me a healthy amount of skepticism and concern, which I have written about previously. The road to Hell is paved with good intentions, and I must come down on the side of less regulation of the Internet rather than more. Not only are there unintended side-effects from government regulation, but I believe efforts to control the Internet, no matter how well intentioned will only drive individuals, organizations, and companies to countries whose governments do not take a heavy hand. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marginalia &#187; Net Neutrality</title>
		<link>http://peteashdown.org/journal/2006/07/02/a-series-of-tubes/comment-page-1/#comment-599</link>
		<dc:creator>Marginalia &#187; Net Neutrality</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jul 2006 10:45:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peteashdown.org/journal/?p=77#comment-599</guid>
		<description>[...] For a long time (at least a few months), I was firmly on the side of net neutrality proponents. But then I read Pete Ashdown&#8217;s position. For those who don&#8217;t know, Pete Ashdown is the Democrat running against Orrin Hatch for the U.S. Senate. He&#8217;s also the founder of Xmission, Utah&#8217;s first ISP. He&#8217;s a progressive guy, who seems to understand the internet and the policy issues around it. His interview with Wired News showed me how a net neutrality law could potentially be bad for consumers:  I tend more to take an anti-regulation standpoint on the internet, and (though) it is very easy to say, &#8220;We don&#8217;t want the government censoring the internet,&#8221; it becomes a much more complex issue when we&#8217;re talking about net neutrality. &#8220;Well we should have the government confirm that neutrality, and guarantee it.&#8221; But does that mean that I can&#8217;t prioritize video traffic and voice traffic in my own network, (which) is obviously needed, that has to be more of a real-time situation? You know, for a long time I prioritized gaming traffic, because that&#8217;s what my customers desire. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] For a long time (at least a few months), I was firmly on the side of net neutrality proponents. But then I read Pete Ashdown&#8217;s position. For those who don&#8217;t know, Pete Ashdown is the Democrat running against Orrin Hatch for the U.S. Senate. He&#8217;s also the founder of Xmission, Utah&#8217;s first ISP. He&#8217;s a progressive guy, who seems to understand the internet and the policy issues around it. His interview with Wired News showed me how a net neutrality law could potentially be bad for consumers:  I tend more to take an anti-regulation standpoint on the internet, and (though) it is very easy to say, &#8220;We don&#8217;t want the government censoring the internet,&#8221; it becomes a much more complex issue when we&#8217;re talking about net neutrality. &#8220;Well we should have the government confirm that neutrality, and guarantee it.&#8221; But does that mean that I can&#8217;t prioritize video traffic and voice traffic in my own network, (which) is obviously needed, that has to be more of a real-time situation? You know, for a long time I prioritized gaming traffic, because that&#8217;s what my customers desire. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://peteashdown.org/journal/2006/07/02/a-series-of-tubes/comment-page-1/#comment-587</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jul 2006 02:56:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peteashdown.org/journal/?p=77#comment-587</guid>
		<description>Pete,

I had an interesting conversation with a potential voter at Washington County&#039;s homecoming bash for the Triple Deuce on Friday; he was also concerned about technology.  When I told him that you founded XMission, he was impressed.  Later, I came across a lady he was with.  She asked who Pete Ashdown was after seeing my shirt, and he said that you were the person to vote for.

Since I was there handing out water with the Democrats of Southern Utah and didn&#039;t have their shirt, I wore my Pete Ashdown shirt.  One lady said, &quot;Cool shirt!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pete,</p>
<p>I had an interesting conversation with a potential voter at Washington County&#8217;s homecoming bash for the Triple Deuce on Friday; he was also concerned about technology.  When I told him that you founded XMission, he was impressed.  Later, I came across a lady he was with.  She asked who Pete Ashdown was after seeing my shirt, and he said that you were the person to vote for.</p>
<p>Since I was there handing out water with the Democrats of Southern Utah and didn&#8217;t have their shirt, I wore my Pete Ashdown shirt.  One lady said, &#8220;Cool shirt!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
